Historical Blunder of Left parties in 2008

 What are the inner and outer reasons for the Left parties in India to withdraw the support to then UPA Government. What were the consequences? Who benefited politically out of this decision? Did the Left parties gained in the eventually Parliament elections? Who paved the way to the Hindu Communal forces to raise in political arena ? Comgress or Communists?

The withdrawal of support by the Left parties to the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government in India in 2008 was a significant political event with both inner (ideological) and outer (strategic) reasons, as well as far-reaching consequences. Below is a detailed analysis of the situation:

Inner Reasons (Ideological and Policy Differences):

  1. Nuclear Deal with the USA (123 Agreement):

    • The primary reason for the Left's withdrawal of support was their opposition to the Indo-US Civil Nuclear Agreement, which they viewed as compromising India's sovereignty and aligning too closely with US strategic interests.

    • The Left argued that the deal would undermine India's independent foreign policy and push the country into a strategic alliance with the US, which they saw as imperialist.

  2. Economic Policies:

    • The Left was critical of the UPA government's neoliberal economic policies, including privatization, liberalization, and globalization, which they believed were against the interests of the working class and farmers.

    • They also opposed the government's approach to labor reforms and its perceived pro-corporate stance.

  3. Ideological Differences:

    • The Left parties, particularly the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] and the Communist Party of India (CPI), have historically been critical of the Congress party's centrist policies, which they viewed as insufficiently progressive or socialist.

Outer Reasons (Political and Strategic Considerations):

  1. Pressure from the Left's Base:

    • The Left's traditional support base, including trade unions and peasant organizations, was increasingly critical of the UPA's policies, and the Left felt compelled to take a stronger stance to retain their credibility.

  2. Electoral Calculations:

    • The Left hoped that withdrawing support would strengthen their position as a principled opposition force and help them consolidate their base in states like West Bengal and Kerala.

  3. Congress's Refusal to Compromise:

    • The Congress-led UPA government refused to back down on the nuclear deal, leaving the Left with no option but to withdraw support to maintain their ideological stance.

Consequences of the Withdrawal:

  1. Survival of the UPA Government:

    • Despite the Left's withdrawal, the UPA government survived with the support of the Samajwadi Party (SP), which stepped in to provide the necessary votes in Parliament.

  2. Early Elections:

    • The political instability led to early general elections in 2009, which the UPA won with an improved mandate, largely due to the popularity of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and the Congress's effective campaign.

  3. Weakening of the Left:

    • The Left parties suffered significant electoral losses in the 2009 Lok Sabha elections, particularly in their stronghold states like West Bengal and Kerala.

    • Their decision to withdraw support was seen by many as politically miscalculated, as it did not resonate with the broader electorate.

Who Benefited Politically?

  1. Congress:

    • The Congress-led UPA emerged stronger after the 2009 elections, as the nuclear deal and the government's survival were seen as signs of stability and decisive leadership.

  2. Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP):

    • While the BJP did not immediately benefit from the Left's withdrawal, the political fragmentation and the Left's decline indirectly helped the BJP in the long run by weakening the secular and leftist opposition.

  3. Regional Parties:

    • Parties like the Samajwadi Party (SP) and Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) gained temporary leverage by supporting the UPA government, but their influence waned in subsequent elections.

Did the Left Parties Gain in the Eventually Parliament Elections?

  • No, the Left parties did not gain in the 2009 Lok Sabha elections. In fact, they suffered significant losses:

    • In West Bengal, their traditional stronghold, they lost ground to the Trinamool Congress (TMC).

    • In Kerala, they faced setbacks due to internal divisions and anti-incumbency.

    • Nationally, their seat share in Parliament declined, marking the beginning of a long-term decline in their political influence.

Who Paved the Way for Hindu Communal Forces to Rise?

  • The rise of Hindu communal forces, particularly the BJP, cannot be attributed solely to the Congress or the Communists. However, certain actions and failures of both contributed indirectly:

    1. Congress:

      • The Congress's failure to address issues like corruption (e.g., the 2G and coal scams), economic inequality, and social justice created disillusionment among voters, making them more receptive to the BJP's narrative.

      • The Congress's perceived minority appeasement policies were exploited by the BJP to polarize voters along religious lines.

    2. Communists:

      • The Left's decline, particularly in West Bengal, created a political vacuum that was filled by the TMC and, to some extent, the BJP.

      • The Left's inability to adapt to changing political realities and their rigid ideological stance alienated younger voters and marginalized their influence.

  • Ultimately, the BJP's rise was facilitated by a combination of factors, including effective leadership under Narendra Modi, a well-organized cadre, and a narrative of development combined with Hindu nationalism. The Congress and the Left's failures created an environment where the BJP could capitalize on anti-incumbency and ideological polarization.

Conclusion:

The Left's withdrawal of support to the UPA government in 2008 was driven by ideological opposition to the nuclear deal and economic policies, as well as strategic political considerations. However, the decision backfired, leading to their electoral decline and the strengthening of the Congress in the short term. In the long run, the weakening of the Left and the Congress's failures created opportunities for the BJP to rise, paving the way for the dominance of Hindu nationalist forces in Indian politics.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 2G Spectrum, Commonwealth Games and Coal Allocation Scams

  2G spectrum scam, Commonwealth Games scam, and coal allocation scam.: Explain These Scams. Who are the main accused in these cases. Did these scams proved in the court of law. What did the court said at the end. Present a detailed report. The 2G Spectrum Scam, Commonwealth Games Scam, and Coal Allocation Scam are three major corruption scandals that rocked India in the late 2000s and early 2010s. These scams involved high-ranking officials, politicians, and business entities, and they highlighted significant issues in governance and transparency. Below is a detailed report on each scam, including the main accused, the status of court proceedings, and the final judgments. 1. 2G Spectrum Scam Overview: The 2G Spectrum Scam emerged in 2010 and involved the illegal allocation of 2G spectrum licenses to telecom companies at undervalued prices during the tenure of Telecom Minister A. Raja. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) estimated a loss of ₹1.76 lakh crore (approximately $3...
Read more

On Withdrawal of Support to the UPA Government by Left Parties

 On 2 June 2008 the RSP Central Committee decided to pull out of the committee, arguing that unilateral actions of UPA had rendered the committee meaningless and that the policies of the UPA government were paving the path for growing BJP influence. On Withdrawal of Support to the UPA Government August 7, 2009 Press Statement  The Left parties have issued the following statement:  On Withdrawal of Support to the UPA Government The Left Parties have withdrawn support to the UPA Government. The UPA Government came into existence in 2004 with the support of the Left parties on the basis of its Common Minimum Programme. The aim was to fight the communal forces and undo the damage they had done to the secular polity of India in their years in office. This required a set of interlinked policies to bring relief to the people, to protect India’s integrity and to pursue an independent foreign policy. By going ahead with the deal at a time when there is the crushing burden of price...
Read more